Rogerian Argument Essay Example For Students

Rogerian Argument Essay Outline1 Introduction2 Rogerian Argument Essay Sample3 Conclusion Introduction In the modern world, social networking sites represent an enormous amount of opportunities, such as communicating with friends, reading publications, watching videos, sharing your information, engaging in discussions, creating communities, and much more, which gives social networking sites the opportunity to call them a great social networking achievement. But there is the reverse side of the medal. Mistakes come together with enormous opportunities of these sites. It’s inappropriate to claim that social networking sites are a single solid problem. With disciplined and correct interaction, you can get some benefits from social networking sites, such as search engine Google, Facebook or Twitter and make life easier for you. But there is always the risk that wrong interaction with the Internet will have harmful effects on your psyche. That’s why the issue of Rogerian Argument is created. In this article, we want to provide our readers with the example of Rogerian Argument Essay that can be used in the education of college students. Rogerian Argument Essay Sample Studies show that four people die each day because of accidental gun fire. Anti-gun users have pointed out the fact that states who have relaxed their gun laws have had an increase in homicides. Also the fact that more people have died from criminal use of guns than people in the civil war. Some feel it is extremely easy for just about anyone to get access to a handgun. The laws in some states dont require a waiting period , several forms of identification, or even a back round check. Anti-gun users feel that if handguns are illegal it may not be impossible for criminals to obtain them but it would be much more difficult. If that were true some believe there will be a drastic decrease in gang violence and armed robbery. The ultimate argument pro-gun users have is the second amendment which states an individuals right to keep and bear arms. They feel it is there right to be able to own a gun to protect themselves from those who want to cause harm. If guns were outlawed and criminals were still finding a way to access a gun the common citizen would be helpless against them. Pro-gunners are aware of the many accidental deaths caused by the misuse of guns, however the fact remains that a numerous amount of people are killed each day by careless drivers. They are aware that accidental deaths can be caused by a variety of different things, so should they give up there right to own a gun to protect them if the need arises. Individuals that support the second amendment stand by the fact that it is better to have a gun and not need it then to need a gun and not have it. The question of whether or not guns should be legal is quite a difficult one to make. There may be a way to find an agreeable middle point. Perhaps the laws pertaining to acquiring a handgun could be changed to be more strict on who they give permits to carry a gun to. Getting a permit could require a full background check and several forms of identification. A waiting period of one to three weeks can be required and inforced. This could cut down on the fact that in some states anyone can walk into a gun shop and give a fake name and walk out with a gun that day. Another way to compromise would be to completely limit guns to shooting ranges and hunting grounds. That way those who feel the compulsion to use guns can be restrained to a location where less accidents can occur. It is possible to lessen the number of accidental deaths caused by guns without banning them completely. Category: English .